Buhari, APC, the Northern Elites and Boko Haram: connecting the dots…

On September 25, 1997, the Israeli secret service in an attempt to hit at the Hamas leadership through it’s MOSSAD agents injected a poisonous toxin into the ears of the Palestinian political leader of the Hamas movement; Khaled Meshaal. Although the Israeli MOSSAD agents were apprehended, Kahled Meshaal was far from fettle for it was only the Israelis that owned the antidote that could cure him. And this was the ultimate aim of the Israelis; to create a problem only they (the Israelis) can solve. The Jordanian government and Hamas made all kinds of threats, but it fell on the deaf ears of the Israeli government. The more they threaten, the more the condition of the Hamas leader was getting closer to a point of no return. Seeing they had no hope or solution to the problem, they chose to negotiate with the Israelis, who in turn gave them the antidote.

THE NIGERIAN CASE: In a bid to dismiss the current insurgency crisis in Northern Nigeria as a Northern agenda, some people argue that Boko Haram had existed before the leadership of President Goodluck Jonathan. This is true but it does not rule-out the myriad evidences and arguments to support the claims that Boko Haram is a Northern agenda and creation to distabilize the government of President Jonathan.

To raise a wild dog, one must first of all nurture and train it from infancy for sometime before it finally becomes fit at the desired time needed to unleash it. Today, Boko Haram seems to appear to be like the wild dog which doesn’t hid to the voice of its master anymore.

General Buhari and the APC have boasted that only them can solve the Boko Haram crisis. Their claims may sound political but like the case of the Israeli poisoning, APC and General Buhari could truly be the ones that have the antidote of the Boko Haram menace if and only if it is their creation.

General Buhari and the APC are in a habit of mocking and dismissing all efforts of the present government in combating the insurgency. When the government shows a desire to negotiate with the sect, they’ll pelt criticisms at such moves. When the government uses the military to combat the militia, they’ll cry foul, saying force should not be used. The solution they’ve offered to us is simply “vote us in and it’ll be over”.

General Buhari among his many reckless statements is quoted to have said that the Boko Haram insurgents are freedom fighters and not terrorists. This statement alone leaves us in bewilderment. The Boko Haram militia doesn’t call itself terrorists, to them they are freedom fighters, fighting for a cause. And it is only one who is a member of the sect or sympathetic to their cause that will argue that the militias are freedom fighters. The evil this sect has committed is so overwhelming and even recently they invaded a high school in Yobe state, killing several school children then absconded with the female students. Is this what a sound person would call FREEDOM FIGHTING? To call them freedom fighters is to approve of their acts and be sympathetic to their cause.

Recently, it has been said the terrorist group released the names of people on their wanted list. Buhari and some APC stalwarts were among the names mentioned, so I heard. I read they went ahead to warn the APC and Northern elites that they desire a President Jonathan in power. How can anyone fall for such a cheap deceit? Those mentioned on the list more than anyone else such be suspected of sponsoring the group. The Boko Haram group has severally repeated that they desire an Islamic state governed by the Shariah law.

During the time the government seek to negotiate with the militia group, the group refused, blatantly citing that they cannot negotiate on the terms of a non-muslim (President Jonathan), because to them a non-muslim is a “najis” (one of the filthiest thing possible as stated in the Islamic doctrine). They stated that until the President vacates power for a muslim ruler, then will they consider speaking of negotiations. To show their dogmatism on the matter, when former President, Olusegun Obasanjo visited a relative of their former spiritual leader who was killed by the government, the sect launched an immediate assassination on the man who spoke with the former president, citing he has erred the Islamic principle of the sect in accommodating and negotiating with a non-muslim. How can we forget so quickly?

Boko Haram which is pro-Islamization cannot support a non-muslim and anything unislamic. What they have just done in naming the purporting people on their hit list is called “Taquia”. Taquia is deceiving and playing con on your enemies. Taquia is permited in Islam to advance the cause of Allah and deceive your enemies.

What Boko Haram has just done is an attempt to arouse the gullible in pointing fingers at the government of President Jonathan as their sponsor and patron and the one whose interest they are fighting to protect, hence, Buhari and the rest of the crew as their targets, thus pushing the electorates on the side of their team. Elections is just by the corner, let’s not forget.

It is reasonable to say that Boko Haram has directly shown us those they are sympathetic of and probably their sponsors. To protect them, they are trying to make them appear like their target and supposed enemy. This is just a childish hoodwink, the desperation to clinch to power has never been so easily exposed through this. By the way, let’s not forget who was quoted to have said :
“If what happened in 2011 should happen again in 2015, by the grace of God, the dog and the baboon would all be soaked in blood.”
Connect the dots….


Quran Science 2: Sun rise and Sun Set

The Koran asserts that the Sun sets in a muddy spring:

Quran 18: 86 Till, when he (the traveller Zul-qarnain) reached the setting-place of the Sun, he found it going down into a muddy spring…

Quran 18: 90 Till, when he reached the rising-place of the Sun, he found it rising on a people for whom We had appointed no shelter from it.

How can this come from an acclaimed book of science!? Firstly, it is a scientifically accepted fact that, the Sun never go down in a muddy spring. Secondly, this seems to also paint a picture of a FLAT Earth, otherwise how can there be an extreme point in the West or in the East? A sunrise there would be basically just the same as at any other place on this earth, at land or sea. It would still look as if it is setting “far away”. It does say, that he reached THE PLACE where the Sun sets and in his second Journey the place where it rises.

A resting place for Sun!?
Quran 36: 38 And the sun runneth on unto a resting place for him. That is the measuring of the Mighty, the Wise.
Quran 36: 39 And for the moon We have appointed mansions till she return like an old shrivelled palm leaf.
Quran 36: 40 It is not for Sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day. They float each in an orbit.

This is hilariously illiterate! Where is the sun and where is moon situated? Can anybody tell me how they could collide/meet/overtake each other? Are the sun and the moon neighbors to each other? It is very clear that the writers of the koran through their bare eye observations, their primitive mind made them assume that the sun and moon were constantly traveling from east to west in the same Sky area or same path, without colliding, causing day and night etc. Their limited knowledge of science and the earth could hardly make them imagine that all these phenomena are simply due to Earth’s rotation and not by Sun’s so-called movement. The Sun is stationary; it never moves.

The ridiculous part is to claim that an All-knowing Being in the person of Allah wrote their twaddle. Allah never says any where in the whole Quran that the EARTH ROTATES. Perhaps Allah could not feel earth’s rotation.

A resting place for sun WAS CONFIRMED BY HADITHS?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 54, Number 421
Sahih Bukhari Hadiths: Abzur Ghifari (ra) narrated: one day Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) asked me, “Abzar do you know after setting where does Sun go?” I replied, I do not know, only Allah’s apostle can say better. Then Prophet (SA) replied, “After setting, the sun remains prostrated under Allah’s Aro’sh and waits for Allah’s command for rising again in the East. Day will come when sun will not get permission to rise again and Qeyamot will fall upon Earth”.

The superstitious belief of ancient people is clearly reflected in the Quran and Hadiths by the acclaimed Allah, that I underst. A 10-year-old boy would not tell such fairy tale story today.

Jihadism: The Islamic Nightmare

“Islam is the religion of peace”, the muslim tries so hard to explain. No other religion on earth struggles so hard to proof itself as peaceful like Islam, but its a mere excercise of rhetoric in futility. To say Islam is religion of peace is to say a lion is a domestic animal. If Islam was a religion of peace, the Muslim apologists won’t struggle so hard to make its case and there would have been no need for such rhetoric. Buddhists don’t run around saying “Budhhism is a religion of peace”, the same goes to Hinduism, Taoism and the rest of them. Its only Islam that suffers with the guilt and burden to assuage itself of the war and terrorism that is carried-out in its name. But the more they say Islam is a religion of peace, the more the insurgents in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Mali, Central African Republic, Kenya, Northern Nigeria, etc, keep make a mess of their jokes.

Jihadism is a long practised Islamic ideology which Mohammed used as a tool to kill his opponents and spread Islam. Mohammed was not a diplomatic man. His many war games, slave trades and robbery speaks for itself. As such, he exhorted his followers to exterminate non-muslims in their mist and spread the poisonous ideology through sweat and blood. The numerous verses in the Quran and the Hadith speaks for itself, which I’ll share later on. Even Islamic Scholars/philosophers spoke greatly of the importance of Jihadism to the muslim,

We can find hundreds of books written by well-known Islamic authorities (Islamic Chintabid or thinker) on Jihad. A few examples of historical events and comments should be enough to lay the foundation that Jihad in Islamic history was primarily a Holy War against the infidels. Here are some examples:

In his book, “ Jurisprudence in Muhammad’s Biography” the Azhar scholar, Dr. Muhammad Sa’id Ramadan al-Buti wrote the following: “The Holy War (Islamic Jihad), as it is known in Islamic Jurisprudence, is basically an offensive war. This is the duty of Muslims in every age when the needed military power becomes available to them. This is the phase in which the meaning of Holy war has taken its final form. Thus the apostle of God said: ‘ I was commanded to fight the people until they believe in Allah and his messages…..(page 134, 7th edition) ”.

Azhar scholar Dr. Buti adds in the same book (page-263): The apostle of Allah started to send military detachments from among his followers to the various Arab tribes which were scattered in the Arab Peninsula to carry out the task of calling (these tribes) to accept Islam. If they did not respond, they (Muslims) would kill them. That was during the 7th Hgira year. The number of the detachments amounted to ten.”

The Baydawi quoted in his book (The lights of Revelation, page-252): “Fight Jews and Christians because they violated the origin of their faith and they do not believe in the religion of the truth (Islam), which abrogated all other religions. Fight them until they pay the poll-tax (Ziziya tax) with submission and humiliation.”

In another place of his book (The Jurisprudence in Muhammad’s Biography) Al-Buti (published in Egypt) quoted: “The concept of Holy War (Jihad) in Islam does not take into consideration whether defensive or an offensive war. Its goal is the exaltation of the Word of Allah and the construction of Islamic society and the establishment of Allah’s Kingdom on Earth regardless of the means. The means would be offensive warfare. In this case, it is the apex, the noblest Holy War. It is legal to carry on a Holy War.”

Ibn Hisham-Al Sohaily quoted in his famous book (Al- Rawd al- Anaf, page-50,51 ): ” No two religions are to exist in the Arab Peninsula .” Therefore, Saudi Government does not allow any other religion to manifest their religious task. What a tolerant and peaceful religion Islam is!

The well-known Egyptian scholar, Sayyid Qutb, (Sayyid Qutb, Milestones, Revised Edition, chapter. 4, “Jihaad in the Cause of God”) notes four stages in the development of jihad:
1.While the earliest Muslims remained in Mecca before fleeing to Medina, God did not allow them to fight;

2. Permission is given to Muslims to fight against their oppressors;
3.God commands Muslims to fight those fighting them;
4.God commands the Muslims to fight against all polytheists.

Sayyid Qutb views each stage to be replaced by the next stage in this order, the fourth stage to remain permanent). To justify the universal and permanent dimensions of jihad he cites the following Qur’anic passages:

Quran: 4:74-32: They ought to fight in the way of God who have sold the life of this world for the life of the Hereafter; and whoever fights in the way of God and is killed or becomes victorious, to him shall We (God) give a great reward…

Quran: 8:38-40: and fight them until there is no oppression and the religion is wholly for God….

Quran: 9:29-32: Fight against those among the People of the Book (Jews and Christians) who do not believe in God and the Last Day, who do not forbid what God and His messenger have forbidden, until they are subdued and pay jizyah (tax on non-Muslims) …

Sayyid Qutb, however, pours scorn upon those who view jihad as solely defensive:

… They are ignorant of the nature of Islam and of its function, and that it has a right to take the initiative for human freedom. Thus wherever an Islamic community exists which is a concrete example of the Divinely-ordained system of life, it has a God-given right to step forward and take control of the political authority so that it may establish the Divine system on earth, while it leaves the matter of belief to individual conscience.

Maulana Mawdudi’s Fatwa:

Likewise, the popular Pakistani Muslim revivalist Abu’l Ala Mawdudi rejects any distinction between offensive and defensive jihad. So also, the distinguished contemporary Pakistani scholar, Fazlur Rahman, while recognizing the extensive presence of jihad in the Qur’an, rejects the stand of those modern Muslim apologists who have tried to explain the jihad of the early (Muslim) Community in purely defensive terms (Fazlur Rahman, Islam (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979) 37).

According to the Encyclopaedia of Islam, “the fight is obligatory even when the unbelievers have not started it (E. Tyan, “Djihad”, Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd ed. (Leiden: Brill, 1965). In the words of Rudolph Peters the “ultimate aim of jihad is ‘the subjection of the unbelievers’ and ‘the extirpation of unbelief’” (Rudolph Peters, “Jihad”, The Encyclopedia of Religion (NewYork: Macmillan, 1987) Vol. 8:88-91).

All of these authorities simply echo Islam’s fundamental assumption that world sovereignty must be in the hands of Muslims.

Quran: 16:101: And when We put a revelation in place of (another) revelation, – and Allah knoweth best what He revealeth – they say: Lo! thou art but inventing. Most of them know not.

On the basis of these verses there arose within the Muslim community the principle of Qur’anic interpretation, called naskh (“abrogation”) which stipulated that earlier peaceful verses could be abrogated by later militant verses, i.e., in the case of jihad the Meccan verses were abrogated by the Medinan verses. It is well known that many Muslim scholars in the early history of Islam contended that Qur’an 9:5, sometimes called “the verse of the sword”, abrogated a host of peaceful passages in earlier portions of the Qur’an.

What it has signified in the past and signifies at present for masses of Muslims is well summarized in a statement by the world renowned Ibn Khaldun (A.D. 1332-1406), Islam’s great historian, sociologist and philosopher:

In the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore, caliphate and royal authority are united in (Islam), so that the person in charge can devote the available strength to both of them at the same (Ibn Khaldun, The Muqaddimah, trans. by Franz Rosenthal (New York: Pantheon Books Inc., 1958) Vol. 1:473).

(The Translation of the Meanings of Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 1:xxiv-xliii ).

So, it is incumbent upon us (Muslims) to follow the path which Allah’s Messenger (Muhammad) adopted to avoid polytheism and heresy in all its shapes and to take the Holy Qur’an and the Prophet’s Traditions as torches in front of us to guide us. We have to teach our brethren and convey the Message to non-Muslims all over the world as much as possible in order to save them from the Hell-fire. We have to prepare ourselves to stand in the face of our enemy and to possess the means of power and to participate in the progress of useful industries in order to protect our religion and be powerful enough to face our enemy, as Allah, the Elevated says in Surat al-Anfal (8:60):

Qur’an: 8:60: Against them (kaffirs) make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war (tanks, places, missiles and other weapons, etc.) to strike terror into the (hearts of) the Enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others beside, whom you may not know, but whom Allah does know. Whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah, shall be repaid to you, and you shall not be treated unjustly

How many terrorists would appeal to this verse “to strike terror into the hearts of the enemy”?

The majority of the Qur’an’s texts themselves clearly identify jihad as physical warfare in Islam and, Islamically, God’s way of establishing the Kingdom of God on earth. Likewise, from the Hadith and the earliest biographies of Muhammad it is just as evident that the early Muslim community understood these Qur’anic texts to be taken literally. Historically, therefore, from the time of Muhammad onwards, jihad as physical warfare in support of the message of Islam has been a reality for the Muslim community. Hence, it comes as no surprise when even terrorists (Osama and his al-Qaeda) easily appeal to these source materials to justify their actions, not to speak of their teachers who teach the theory and the art of terrorism. September 11, 2001, terrorist act in the soil of America is the glittering example of Jihadi mindset of Islamist like Osama bin Laden.

Qur’anic Ayats (I just mentioned above) and numerous Sahi Hadiths of same kind were instrumental for Muslims to dedicate their strength & minds for the cause of Islam. Therefore, in the name of spreading the religion, devout Muslim fighters killed millions of people while occupying neighboring Arab lands such as Syria, Jordan, Palestine, Egypt, Iraq and non-Arab countries like India, Turkey, Libya, Iran etc. Even Spain had fallen into their hands for hundreds of years. I simply wonder were these wars defensive. Were those swords used by Islamic soldiers to occupy country after country be considered a symbol of forgiveness or mercy? Following Muhammad’s death, his companions fought each other in relentless savage wars competing for authority.

In summary, Islamic Jihad with the help of Islamic sword–hundreds of tribes were wiped out from the Arabian Peninsula. Thousands were orphaned and widowed. Hazzaz bin Yousuf killed more than a hundred thousand Sahabis, Ibne Khattal was killed in Kaba’a. Later Abdulla Bin Zubair was killed in the same Kaba’a. By the end of the first civil war of Muslims, all the Badari Sahabis were killed. By the end of three civil wars all the Sahabis were killed “it sucked up all the strength of Muslims” ( Bokhari). Ten thousand Muslims were killed in the Jamal war between Hazrat Ali (RA) and Bibi Ayesha (RA). Islamic scholar Dr. Abu Zayd Shalabi claimed in his book (page-75), in the ‘battle of Alees’ which took place on the border of Iraq, (Siffin war between Hazrat Ali and Hazrat Mwabia ), the great Islamic General Khalid killed 70,000 people.

Thousands of non-Muslims were killed. After the death of Prophet Muhammad, there were four most favorite disciples of Prophet who ruled the Islamic kingdom established by the prophet Muhammad, who were known as the most pious caliphs. Out of these four Caliphs—three of them were brutally assassinated, and only one had natural death because of his old age and very short rule of the Islamic state. Karbala was flooded with blood with a roar of “Allahu Akbar!” Was it because of the fact that Islamic sword was the sign of Mercy? The fact of the matter is—sword can never be the sign of mercy! Period.

Global Agenda: As I cited various valuable quotes, which clearly depicted a special and unique feature, which is totally absent in any other monolithic religions of the world. Unlike any other world religion—Islam has an ulterior motive in its agenda. Islam considers it has a sacred and mandatory God given duty to spread Islamic message (Din-e-Islam) to all the inhabitants of the world. Their ultimate wishful goal is to convert and bring entire mankind under the fold of Islam, the only true religion of Allah. To this end—two main groups are working very hard. These two groups are: (a) Militant/radical Mullahs, (b) Educated/elite western residing true believing Muslims (Muslims of the ummatic groups in the west such as: AMC, CAIR, ICNA, ISNA, NABIC etc). Here we can exclude group-C Muslims (general God fearing innocent gullible Muslims who constitute about 70-80% of the total Muslims.

Both the groups (A & B) have one thing common in their minds. That is to convert sufficient peoples to Islam in order to establish Islamic Sharia’h or Huhud Laws (Allah’s laws just like Afghan Taliban state) as the state governing administration. Here the main difference is—group A (Militant/fanatics) is engaged in armed struggles (Holy war, Terrorism); and group-B (mainly western resident) is engaged in secret and peaceful propagation with sweet talks and peaceful persuasion of the gullible western peoples by deceitful sermons in the mosques and in various annual and semi-annual Islamic conferences and meetings (Ummatic conference). Both have one last thing in mind—to establish Islamic Sharia’h law in the state.

THE UNBELIVER’S GUIDE: The four types of Christians and the ONE you must avoid PT 2

…Continuation from Part1


The level-playing aka the Sunday-service Christians make-up about 50% of the Christian echelon. Just like their name says, they are the “regular” christians whose righteousness and holiness are at its peak on Sundays.

You know the type of Christians that talks shit from Monday to Saturday, act very radical from Monday to Saturday, but as soon as its 5am on Sunday morning, they’ll be acting like they’ve been washing hands with Jesus for a 100 years. They are the type that’ll come out from the Club by 4am in the morning rush home, get dressed and go to church with a duck-face.

One thing I love about these folks is their sunday-service drama; they’re the first to drop to their knees at the sound of the worship song. They know Kirk Franklin’s Songs more than Kirk Franklin. The lady Christian in this category are the first to detonate tears to the lord when worship songs with lyrics like “Jesus I love you”, “You make my life beautiful”, “You make me complete”, etc. The weight of their crocodile-tears will make the Jesus crucifix be wondering who is really the one crucified here.

One thing characteristic about them is their Sunday-service apparels. They dress so good to church even the pastor would be threatened to raise more tithes and offerings to keep up with the satin competition. The females in this genre, dress so good, even the Pastor’s wife would be wondering if there are contenders for her position. She’ll transfer the burden of competition on her husband who’ll transfer the burden to the congregation to give more onto the Lord.

If they are the hat-wearing Christians, their hat would be so large to shelter an umbrella from the rain, their high-heel shoes never disappoints the church’s floor. “Koi koi koi”, says the church tile as they saunter across the church auditorium with their I-pad and samsung tablets. In those days, they were recipients of fancy/colourful bibles, but thanks to the god of Samsung/Apple and all things tablet. These category of Christians are the biggest patronizers of tablet devices just for the Sunday show. In a place like Nigeria, it is now very trendy. As a matter fact, Nigerian Pentecostal Christians have taken it to another level with their Gucci, Prada, I-pad/tablets pouches, it is now an operation “show-me -your-pouche”.

Unlike the former (the Indifferent Christian) who only knows John 3:16 and Psalms 23, the Sunday-service christians knows a bit more like the Malachi tithing verse, a couple of Jesus verses and quotes, Paul’s ego-boosting rhetoric like “by his stripes I’m healed”, “He became poor, that we might be rich”, “The kingom of God suffereth violence…. And violence taketh it by force”, etc. If they are the pentecostals, they will know how to spew a few shits aka speak-in-tongues.

The ridiculous thing about these group of christians, is that they barely know the bible but they’ll know all the words of the preacher. You’ll hear them regurgitate stuffs like “Pastor Chris said…”, “The other day when Papa was filled with the anointing, he declared….”, “My Papa in the Lord always says…”, etc. Their knowledge and ignorance is kow-towed to “Papa says”

The Pastors love these kinds of Christians, for they are the first to respond to SEED calling and donations. Their payment of tithe is not an option, there is no contest on this one, the pastor is at ease that his bank account is ever smiling cos of these folks.

One very recurrent characteristic of these folks is that when they return home from Service, they’ll be singing aloud to the neighbourhood, so that we’ll know he/she went to church. You may not even have to ask them, they’ll generous tell you “Service was great today mehnnn, it was so powerful today, you missed”.

On the social media like facebook, every Sunday morning, their duty is to post statuses like this : “Good morning friends, make sure you go to church today, it is good to praise the Lord”, “In the presence of God there is fullness of Joy, *off to church*, catch ya later”. Then after Church hours, they’ll post stuffs like “Service was explosive! I felt blessed”, “This is my week of celebration! Today’s sermon was powerful, God bless my pastor, I was touched”, etc

These kind of Christians may not necessarily like the atheists or the unbelievers, they mostly have this “Holy-than-thou mentality”. A lot of them are hypocrites. In a place like Benin city, they’ll go to the shrine on saturday then go to the church on Sunday. To them, if you don’t go to church on Sundays, you’re toast! Their religitard level is 60%.

Part 3: The Proper Religitard….

THE UNBELIVER’S GUIDE: The four types of Christians and the ONE you must avoid PT 1

Anyone can claim to be a Christian but their orientations, modus operandi and general attitude differ. As such I’ve decided to classify Christians into 4 main echelons:
1. The indifferent believer: You know the type person who says he/she is a Christian but they are so indifferent, consistent in displaying a habitual dispassion and lack luster for the church and anything pertaining to Christendom. This type of Christian doesn’t own a bible, if he/she by chance should own one; it’ll look like a well kept quantum physics text book that has survived the cold war through the 1980s till date. The magnanimity of the dust on their bible is so mean they can give a polar bear instant asthma. These kind of Christians, do not belong to a church nor have a place of worship or a pastor (to some “papa-in-the-lord”, they call it). However they are still Christians. If you happen to ask them where they worship or what church they attain, their typical response will be one of the following :
– “I worship God in my home”,
-“Do I have to belong to a church before I worship God?”
– “I was dedicated in the XYZ Church, my parents attend XYZ church, hence, I’m a XYZ member”
These kinds of Christians, their favorite day of the week is Sunday, for nothing separates their penchant for their video games, TV, soccer, sleep or internet. Even their fellow Christians know this. If they are invited by the other set of Santa Claus Brigade to their Sunday services, they’ll give excuses like:
– “I was unprepared”,
– “I want to do laundry”,
– “My friend is doing a child celebration in his church and I can’t miss it, maybe next Sunday”
– “I’m not feeling fine today”, etc
Nothing disgusts them more than their Christian counterparts who inundate them with their church invitations. With these kind of Christians, the pastor is broke, cos the pastor doesn’t see a dime of their penny. He doesn’t even attend the church, how they see his dime? As a matter of fact, pastors aren’t enthusiastic about them unless of course they happen to be very rich, that is when it’ll interest the holy spirit to evangelize to their souls.
The Jehovah witnesses can attest to these Sunday home-loving Christians, for no matter how much they knock on their gates and doors, there is never going to be someone at the door. If by coincidence they meet someone at the door, he’ll always have a legitimate excuse not to entertain them, one of such popular excuses is that “something is cooking on the fire”.
Talk anything with these Christians but not the church and the bible, for they do not have either of them. Besides John 3:16 and Psalms 23, they have no idea about anything in the bible. But if by chance they attend church, they always look cleaner than the preacher. One reason they’ll be moved to attend a church service is because its friend’s or relative’s child dedication ceremony, in the case of men, he’s chasing a lady, etc but something legitimate will always be the reason his feet will take a walk to the church. One more thing, some of them are great fans of 31st night/end of the year church services or 1st Sunday of the year service. Call them the ceremonial Christian aka Christian under duress.
These Christians normally do not have problems with the unbelievers like the atheists and the irreligious. As a matter of fact, these set of Christians love listening and socializing with the irreligious, for they are irreligious people in absentia or atheists/agnostics in the closest. Many of them won’t find the atheist annoying, but rather interesting and will ever be ebullient to have drinks and companionship with them. These kinds of Christians are naturally anti-pastors and preachers, all of them naturally see the preacher and church as a place of fleecing the sheeple. But one thing they’ll never do is to deny they aren’t Christians. To the other Christians, they are SINNERS and UNBELIEVERS like the atheists.


Religion and Threats

Religion and Threats

MAGNUM EST VERITAS PRAE VELEBIT. Translation: “THE TRUTH SPEAKS FOR ITSELF”. A simple scientific law of gravitation does not rely on emotional rhetoric to prove itself to be true, just throw an object up and it’ll come down, simple!!! Science didn’t threaten anyone that does not believe in the law of gravity as “ANTI-GRAVITY”, they just left it open to be contested and if you can prove them wrong, then bravo!! If you ask me, that is GOD, because it’s evidential, credential and unquestionable. But religion hides under the cover of phrases like “BLASPHEMY”, “ETERNAL DAMNATION”, “JIHAD”, etc to prevent scrutiny, if you are telling the truth why are you threatening people about it? The answer is simple; you don’t want people to expose your gaffes and loopholes, period!! Scrutiny is indeed the Achilles heel of twaddle.

The first sign of falsehood is its inability to stand-up to scrutiny and questioning. Whatever shields itself from questioning has a lot to hide. Religion forbids questioning and scrutiny and cannot stand-up to critical examination but at the same time it claims to be absolute, infallible and has all the answers. Isn’t that an irony? Whatever that bans scrutiny, whatever hates questioning, whatever considers rational and critical examination as a taboo must not be dignified to have Truth or answers. Religion uses threats and the fear factor to propagate its message while shielding itself from scrutiny. Those who scrutinize and ask questions are considered devils, sinners and all forms senseless adjectives. The real devil and sinner is the religion, for whatever is righteous fears not questioning and rational examination. Every great assertion must stand up to great questions.
”Whatever that is asserted without evidence should be dismissed without evidence”- Christopher Hitchens

Religion and threats are handy; like bread and butter, it is possible for religion to propagate without threats. In religion, there is always a curse and threat to every assertion declared alongside the false promises and pious hope. For example in Islam whoever does not recognize and accept Prophet Mohammed as the last messenger and servant of God will be tortured in hell. In Christianity, whoever does not accept Jesus as Lord and Son of God will be condemned to hell. Why are they threatening people? Does anyone need threats to know the sun and the moon is real? Just imagine this: what would you make of me if I go about saying “anyone who doesn’t accept that I am Imoh Son of David, such a person is fool, idiot, and would be burned in a celestial oven underground”? First of all, if I am truly the name I answer, why would I go about threatening people to accept my name? Do you need threats to know that you’re using a Facebook or there exist a company called NOKIA?


The Agony Of The African Race

The Agony Of The African Race

“IF YOU CLOSE YOUR EYES TO FACTS, YOU WILL LEARN THROUGH ACCIDENTS”, says an African proverb. But what do you make of a man who willingly shuts his eyes, and after having consistent accidents blames his predicament and accidents on external forces? Such is the case of the modern day African/black man who has willfully shut his eyes to facts and has equally refused to learn through accidents.

As pulchritudinous and wise the above proverb sounds, one may be forced to admire the magnanimity of the brain and heritage of the mind that thought of this. This is in fact not new to African adages and proverbs; they are always full of wisdom that stand the taste of ages. Hence, it can be asserted that the African ancestry was fun of its coquetry in wisdom and knowledge. For civilization saw its birth place in the mother land.

But can this be said of the present day African and melanated people? Proverbs and wise words can’t be found in the lips of the today’s African, and he desires not to learn either. Today’s African man’s lips are fraught with baseless rhetoric, fatuous regurgitation of flawed texts (in the name of scriptures and verses of holy books) which saw to their slavery and subsequent downfall.

Unlike their ancestors who were men of wisdom and great craft, the children of lions have become sheep. The melanated man of today is an irony and an execration to his ancestors. He can’t cough-out wisdom or words of intelligence; his mind is wired to unethical and illiterate medieval texts in the name of Abrahamism and religion.

The ancestors of the Africans were educated and knowledgeable, even men like Plato came from afar to learn from them, had this to say:
“Compared with these black Egyptians, the Greeks are childish mathematicians.”
~ Plato – (429–347 B.C.E.).
Even Herodotus in his essay said this: “And upon his return to Greece, they gather around and asked, tell us about this great land of the black called Ethiopia.”- Herodotus

Unlike his ancestors who were mathematicians, scholars, educators, physicians, architects, men who were crafty in the art of the wise, their children are walking garbage. They have no knowledge of themselves and their ancestry. The modern black man’s brain is half-bibe/quran and half-bullshit. He boasts on his knowledge of the bible and quran which he barely reads or know and then thinks of himself to be a child of Abraham. How sad; for the offspring of the lion is now made to eat grass.

Today’s melanated man thinks that being called a SHEEP is a virtue, for he stands tall to utter “The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want”, but this Son Of David right here says “The lord is not my shepherd for I am not sheep. I am a black panther; a lion and an eagle in trinity and non of the mentioned needs a shepherd; I am a shepherd and Lord to myself, and a sheep, I shall never be”.

How has the mighty fallen? In 1931 the Cameroonians contributed money to aid the Americans from the Great depression. Today, the Americans are threatening the Africans to corporate with their wishes or risk loosing financial “AIDES”. Back then, the whole world heard of the knowledge and science Africa possessed and men like Plato, Aristotle, Herodotus, Hypatia, etc came to study here. Today we can boast of nothing from our education sector.

Back then Ptolemy I (Soter) and the Roman emperor Constantine envied our spirituality so much, they stole the Horus, Isis, Osiris doctrines to reinvent to Jesus. Today the black man is more fanatic than the people who sold them this parody, he is even more convinced to be a Jew than the real Jew himself.

Why is the African man progressing in retrogression? Frederick Douglass, one of my favorite icons gave the answer better, saying “a man who is knowledgeable is unfit to be a slave”. The average African/ negro, who is likely religious is unknowledgeable and that makes him a slave of indoctrination and religion. The negro has a lack-luster attitude towards science and philosophy, how is he suppose to grow?

If you ask the religious black man about John 3:16, not only will he regurgitate it for you, he’ll feel so pompous and orgasmic about himself in his ability to quote a bible or a Qur’an verse.
If you ask him about electrons, protons and neutrons, he’ll act like you’re feeding him aspirin on mayonnaise. The world is ruled by knowledge. The ability of a race to pursue knowledge and engage in real education will give birth to power and total emancipation.

Galileo Galilei who knew this many centuries ago said: ” OF ALL THE HATREDS, NONE IS GREATER THAN THAT OF IGNORANCE AGAINST KNOWLEDGE.”

You cannot despise knowledge and science and expect to be prosperous and a master of today’s world. That is like expecting a car to move without selecting the gear. Knowledge and marriage to science is the gear of civilization and power, while religion is the sharp nail that deflate its tyres; you can’t get anywhere with it. While the rest of the world is in motion, we are busy deflating our tyres.
The choice is yours, my people